whilst this marketing on children was done on specific products like the toys and games, it has now changed to even clothes, shoes and many more. When i was a kid i was very fond of shoes and i would always insist my parents to get me a pair of shoes no matter how much it used to cost.
According to Powell (1993)Looking around the world it can be observed that in Australia children under 18 have an average spendin of around $31.60 to spend every week and they influence 70% on their parents clothes fast food and purchases.
In US there are about 57 million school going students who spend about $100 million per year on their own and their family money on foods drinks games clothes movies and many more.
So after having a look at the above ratio the car companies cannot ignore the children in their marketing.Car companies like Nissan sponsors the American youth soccer organisation in order to get exposure of their brands in front of the people. Crysler company distributes glossy cardboards opo-up cards that would appeal to the children who love pop-up books.
According to Durning(1992) these additional forms of marketing have supplemented rather than replaced advertising as the importance of the children's market has grown. Their aim however is the same as advertising, to create brand loyalties and customers amongst children. Also, those wanting to sell goods recognise that some older children become somewhat cynical of advertisements and therefore publicity in children's newspapers and magazines as well as other marketing strategies are alternative ways of reaching these children.
Reference List
1.Richard Zoglin, `Is TV ruining our children?', Time, Vol. 136 (15 October 1990)
2.Powell and Zuel, op.cit.
3.McNeal, op.cit., pp. 173-5.
4.Alan Thein Durning, How Much is Enough: The Consumer Society and the Future of the Earth, ed. Linda Starke, Worldwatch Environmental Alert Series (London: Earthscan, 1992), p. 120.
No comments:
Post a Comment